>>
|
No. 69365
>You can't be standoffish and hostile to every hooligan in adulthood
I'm not talking about hooliganism. I'm talking about being an adult and defending yourself WHEN NECESSARY. Despite my clarification, you're still confusing being willing to fight with wanting to fight. Of course peaceful alternatives are better, but sometimes they just aren't available. The country that declares war all the time when they should talk is not going to last just like the idiot that punches whenever he encounters problems. The very concept of freedom for all creates conflict, since the only alternative is that everyone has the same ideas and opinions all the time like one giant cult or hive-mind in order to never clash. Freedom or peace, can't always have both. You just need to realize that fighting for yourself is not always a bad thing.
Additionally, it seems you're also assuming I mean everything physically. Martin Luther King and Martin Luther had to fight, but they didn't use fists, did they? Republicans and Democrats fight for what's right (sometimes, anyway, usually it's just about money), but blood is not drawn (not for a long while, at least). Election opposition, judges, defense lawyers, unions, PR people, all fight with ideas/words, but they definitely fight. You cannot live without conflict simply because not everyone has all the same opinions as you.
>it's impossible in childhood/school, just like it's impossible in war
If you're trying to convince me you're not in high-school, you're getting the opposite of your desired result.
|