-  [JOIN IRC!]


[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Subject   (reply to 18062)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
¯\(°_O)/¯
  • Supported file types are: BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 4883 KB.
  • Images greater than 400x400 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 298 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2015-09-02 Show/Hide Show All


File 136313835222.jpg - (305.98KB , 1680x1050 , swordsman_wallpaper.jpg )
18062 No. 18062
Do we have anyone from TN that can confirm this? Sound interesting.

http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2013/02/26/senators-recognize-the-right-to-bear-knives-ok-swords-for-self-defense
Expand all images
>> No. 18063
Wait... what kind of weirdo wants to bring a sword with them everywhere? Thats akin to being one of those shit heads who doesn't leave home without his AR15 because he wants to "educate and ease peoples fears about guns" while walking around with a high powered machine designed only for killing.
>> No. 18065
File 136347794926.jpg - (86.17KB , 908x601 , 126016486486.jpg )
18065
>>18063

I think you're lost, my friend.

SAGE has been used.
>> No. 18066
>>18063
The point of the article wasn't the swords, my short bus friend. The point was that they recognized that the original intent of the 2nd amendment had to have allowed for bladed weaponry as that was equally common at the time of its writing. The fact that that would ALSO include swords was interesting, but incidental.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason