-  [JOIN IRC!]


[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Subject   (reply to 15834)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
¯\(°_O)/¯
  • Supported file types are: BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 4883 KB.
  • Images greater than 400x400 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 298 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2015-09-02 Show/Hide Show All


File 130383517554.jpg - (44.71KB , 730x450 , implosion_nuclear_weapon_big.jpg )
15834 No. 15834
I'm considering buying a nuclear weapon for home defence, and I'm stuck trying to decide on yield and type. I've always been a fan of implosion-type weapons for their increased portability and stopping power, but the slightly bulkier gun-type weapons do just as good a job for half the cost.

As for yield, I like the W-84 warhead for its great versatility, it can easily be changed from a minuscule 200T yield for taking out just a single block, or turned up to eleven, for a 150KT yield big enough to take out any city that poses a threat to my personal safety. Its only drawback is that its larger and heavier than most warheads I've used, so I'd need a bit of practice to get comfortable with it.

On the other hand, there's the W-79 artillery warhead, which can easily fit into my backpack or laptop bag for when I am traveling inner-city and need a concealed carry, but it's yield is far less potent, capable of only defending against ten to fifteen square blocks at it's maximum. It does scale down to less than a hundred tons of stopping power, so perfect when testing at the range and you don't want to spend too much on ammunition.

I briefly considered going with fusion instead of fission for the extra stopping power, but I realized that when it came down to it, I'd only really be defending myself against a neighborhood or two, large town at most. I probably won't ever need to defend against a whole city or county.

So yeah, any input before I go down to the range would be more than welcome.

(Trolling is not allowed on this board.)
Expand all images
>> No. 15835
Make sure to check the law regarding owning a self defense nuclear device in the area you live, the maximum yield can vary wildly from place to place. A neighbor of mine had his confiscated and also got like $300 fine just because it was a few kilotons over.
>> No. 15836
File 130386441359.jpg - (32.81KB , 400x314 , MIRV.jpg )
15836
Man, I live in California where we're not allowed to have MIRVs with more than 3 warheads. Shit sucks bro.
>> No. 15838
Are you kidding? Here in Illinois we can't even carry fuel-air devices for protection. Its a police state over here.
>> No. 15841
File 130388419214.jpg - (14.66KB , 300x380 , SADM.jpg )
15841
>>15834
Nice. Personally, I open-carry a W54 in the SADM holster (pic is from my phone). I'd have gone for a 79 myself, but I tend to prefer dual-purpose rather than radiation-based, and W79s are hard to come by.
>> No. 15879
File 130630716521.jpg - (412.55KB , 1600x1166 , Ivy_Mike_Sausage_device.jpg )
15879
Me, I prefer an Ivy Mike. Partly because I'm only interested in area defense and think that air blasts are cheating and partly because it's a great ice breaker for guests.

Maintaining the cryogenicis costs a fortune, but I like to show off.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason