-  [JOIN IRC!]


[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Subject   (reply to 391)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
¯\(°_O)/¯
  • Supported file types are: BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 400x400 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 179 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2023-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

File 132682158472.jpg - (76.89KB , 500x708 , new_rose_hotel-poster.jpg )
391 No. 391
Just watched this. Didn't think it was very cyberpunk. Any thoughts?
>> No. 392
It's generally regarded as worse than Johnny Mnemonic for that.
>> No. 428
It had a few good dialogues, but that it is supposedly set in the same universe as Neuromancer is rediculous.
>> No. 430
What I would like to see is a movie or a short based on Burning Chrome.
>> No. 434
>>428

well... it is.
>> No. 460
short story > movie
>> No. 525
I watched it, twice, two worst mistakes of my life. The last third of the film is Willem DaFoe in a room flashing back to the first two thirds of the film. I was excited to see it initially because of the two big names, Christopher Walken and DaFoe, and the fact that it was based on a short story by William Gibson.

The poor editing makes the film difficult to follow, the DoP must have had his head up his ass because the shots were incoherent, and the director somehow managed to get a shitty performance out of two award winning actors.

If I didn't know it was based on a cyber punk short story I never would assume that this was cyber punk.
>> No. 544
Not to go into details: shit. Story was not the best work of Gibson either.
>> No. 547
Does anyone know what Gibson thought of the movie?
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason