>>
|
No. 489
It's annoying that my logical argument against Kant, that there can be no such thing as a categorical imperative when all morals are intention based. For example, Kant describes the act of lying as something that must always be avoided, but is it good to tell a child that his drawing is poor? Conversely, is it always good to save a dying man's life if he wishes to die?
I can't work out what statement and challenge it wants me to link up, and it won't let me have any of those.
|