No.

"Is-ought" statements are illogical. The proper format for an "ought" statement is "is-ought-if".

An example of an is-ought statement is, "A just and kind God exists, therefore, His instructions ought to be followed."

The course of action does not follow from the assertion; the statement is incomplete, because it must contain a qualifier; an 'if'. In this case, it would be, "... if you respect justice and want to do kind things."

The statement thus becomes, in lieu of a recogniseably moral statement, a pragmatic one.

To highlight the point, if we replace the meaning in the statement with nonsense but retain the same structure:

"Bananas exist and you have an anus, therefore you ought to insert the banana up your rectum."

"... If you enjoy inserting bananas up your rectum."

You can see that a statement is only regarded as a moral statement if it is both illogical and contextually recogniseable as being a moral issue. The is-ought problem is thus particularly relevant to moral quandries.