|
>>
|
No. 229
File
133950327343.jpg
- (90.62KB
, 500x579
, WellFuuuuu.jpg
)
>>212
That's not true at all. IPv6 provides a LOT more than just new IP address spaces. The main reason some ISPs don't want to move to IPv6 isn't technical, really, its because in a world where you can do address-proxy anchoring and all your devices can have permanent prefixes you don't have to cough up extra for pointless "services" like a "static" IP address or "dynamic DNS" if you want to host things from your own computer. Everything gets simpler and that lets new ideas in, and this threatens some of the guys who have gotten fat, defensive and stale instead of lean, aggressive and innovative like they used to be.
Its part of what happens when you realize you have been successful somewhere one day and suddenly let your mindset shift from one of "creating success" to "avoiding failure". Its a totally different mindset and it ruins a lot of stuff. Slow IPv6 adoption, especially outside of the US, is due mainly to this. I'm in Japan and NTT and ISPs here charge outrageous fees for basic stuff like addressing and don't want to lose that because of a new addressing paradigm that obsoletes their paid service plans. (ISPs in Japan is a farce to begin with because there are no ISP's here at all -- NTT owns all the wires as a state communications monopoly, ISPs only exist to keep people employed on state subsidy and pretend there is an actual market, which there isn't.)
Blah blah blah...
tl;dr: OP is an uninformed faggot who never studied networking very hard (or at all).
>>213
1/10 trolling in that direction here. But nice try.
|