>>
|
No. 343
File
134888914729.jpg
- (42.29KB
, 500x375
, rms_katana.jpg
)
>>342
Stallman never said selling software is unethical. He even used to sell copies of emacs in tapes (including the source code, of course), in the old days. The "free" in "Free Software" is as in "free speech", not as in "free beer". He's against unfree code probably because of this:
>In 1980, Stallman and some other hackers at the AI Lab were refused access to the source code for the software of a newly installed laser printer, the Xerox 9700. Stallman had modified the software for the Lab's previous laser printer (the XGP, Xerographic Printer), so it electronically messaged a user when the person's job was printed, and would message all logged-in users waiting for print jobs if the printer was jammed. Not being able to add these features to the new printer was a major inconvenience, as the printer was on a different floor from most of the users. This experience convinced Stallman of people's need to be free to modify the software they use. [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stallman#Decline_of_MIT_hacker_culture ]
With commercial software you (usually) do not have the freedom to modify the code, so it should be obvious that's a restriction in freedom even if you think it's fair.
|