What the fuck are you doing with your life, man?

  Blue has a huge d, Green 's body is underwhelmingly flat, Red has a short d and Orange has a hellza tiny d.

Maybe Green is straight after all since in this video she tries to fuck Orange. I theorize that she has daddy issues and asks him for sex just because she wants his approval and attention.

>>73362
Man, don't tell me you've never jerked off to m&ms before. You're missing out.

>>73357

I think most of what you said is on point. Well, with Orange, some gay guys don't like stuff up their butt. Sad, but true. As a marketing technique to appeal to as wide a demographic as possible, I would assume they have one gay M&M. He kind of strikes me as a turbo-ban me though.

Not sure who the real homo is. Maybe Yellow? Red seems like he would just shove his prick into anything that walked. Actually, I think I would probably let him fuck me. He has that type of confidence that says 'I might not have the biggest cock, but I know how to use it'

As a side note, Blue definitely has that long d aura about him, goddamn.

Go write for Cracked and leave us alone, you fuck.

What the hell is going on here? Am I having a stroke? Is this real life?

>>73363
When they look shocked and say "he's definitely blue alright", are they insinuating he has blue balls or are they gawking at the size of his penis?

>>73371
Were you molested by an M&M as a child or something?

>>73368
Yellow does seem to have homoerotic feelings for red. In "show me the peanut" he seemed rather eager to strip tease for Red and in these two commercials (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RmMSZTv8dQ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lptYWujrNa0) he tries to kiss him. For some reason Red cockblocks him, though. I wonder if Red is cockblocking yellow because they are in public and Red is determined to stay on the down low-- after all, the strip tease video takes place in a private setting where Red and Yellow are alone.

>>73371
You shut your whore mouth everyone knows you need 99 on your resume to write for cracked, OP is just putting biding his time until he gets hired.

>>73384
You have it backwards. You don't put 99chan on your resume, because that would make it harder to rip off 99chan when you run out of ideas.

Brockway, if you're still here, I still want my cut of the pathetic $10 they paid you for that article. It's a matter of principle.

>>73357
You've got Ms. Brown all backwards. She's probably way more of a freak when it comes to actually doing stuff, but has to put on that standoffish attitude at first so she can get the right person that knows how to mentally and emotionally stimulate her before physically stimulating her. I believe that it is what weeaboo nerds call kuudere.

She's a foil to that cockteasing green bitch.

>>73378
my dad used to put m&ms in my foreskin

>>73449
I think this is the most important jiff I've saved this year.

>>73474
there's more where that came from anon-kun

rude

rude

rude

rude

http://hccock.blogspot.com/

this man's blog is excellent in general

I, for one, think Seth McFarlane gets off on women fucking dogs.

His mom totally masturbated a dog once. http://www.vulture.com/2012/06/seth-macfarlane-new-yorker-profile.html

http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/the-mystery-of-john-titor-hoax-or-time-traveler-57001

It's 2015 and world war 3 hasn't happened, therefore john titor is full of shit

>>74218
2015 ain't over yet. There's still time, and plenty of motivation too: certainly someone will want to try going full Keynes and start a full-scale war in the hopes of kickstarting the economy.

>>74227
Doesn't work anymore. Guerrilla wars with crappy sandboxes just drains resources and time. You need full, nationwide militarization without suffering major losses to your own territory in order to stimulate economic growth. The only way that could happen is if we went to war with a major military power, but that's unlikely because of the threat of nuclear warfare. The whole "WWII ends Depression in US" was a one-off thing that will probably never happen again.

>>74229
Nuclear war may be less of a deterrent than you'd think. Sure, all the radiation and cancer sounds scary at first, but when you sweep that under the rug all you have to see is an opportunity to rebuild something.

>>74240
Is this hellza that hard to understand? As soon as nuclear war is initiated with a major power, the world ends. What isn't incinerated will be destroyed by radiation drift and severe, overnight climate change. That's why it is a deterrent, not because people are afraid of losing a single or even a handful of cities.

>>74229

Keynes would balk at throwing money at a military industrial complex. Part of the reason giving money to the military worked was because it indirectly subsidized vital industries that were in their infancy (automobiles, highways, fossil fuels, planes). In an advanced economy, simply throwing money at the military is an exercise in waste. Look at Putin's several hundred billion dollar "re-armament" program, pouring endless funds into the least efficient sector of their economy, while leaving the hinterland to be opened up by Chinese investment.

Keynes would have wanted the money to be directed where there was need. Not to mention, many war industries, Boeing for example, supply the private sector. Simply throwing money at them is going to come at the expense of private sector needs, especially since production can't be ramped up overnight.

You make 100 airplane parts at your factory, of which fifty are bought by the military, and fifty are bought by commercial airlines. The government doubling its air force will simply take the entire supply, and leave no spare parts for the civilian airforce. Eventually, they start falling from the sky, because civilians cannot compete with the ridiculous (and cyclical) demand from the military.


Russia is so cynical they used this incompetence as an excuse for that crash that killed the Polish presidential cabinet.

fuck yall. this thread is about Ms.Green's tight ass, not nuclear war.