If you need a tattoo to convince yourself that you're in control then you aren't.

get this one, it says "conqueror's courage" in ancient Korean.

rude

When in doubt, words in a blackletter script always make for popular tattoos. You can't get any less ambiguous about meaning control than the word "control."

Where would you put this, by the way?

>>72708
It's an artistic expression that control connot exist without chaos (I should have mentioned my theme in my OP). This is in no way to validate my post and I have apparently approached the wrong platform to ask such a question.

Oh the underside of my forewarms, if you read my previous post each would be on either side.

>>72722
>I have apparently approached the wrong platform to ask such a question.
I could point out the obvious about your choice of where to ask this question, but I believe that's now called "victim blaming" and "slutshaming."

>It's an artistic expression that [thing] connot exist without [opposite of thing]

just get a fucking yin yang or something and go drown yourself in the toilet at starbucks after showing all your "apsiring writer" friends.

rude

>>72729
So I guess we're just posting cool fascist symbols now, I can dig.

Syrian nationalists have a pretty cool flag.

Even Russian fascists can't stop themselves from spamming red all over the place.

>>72733
Dutch fascists were pretty baller.

rude

rude

>>72708
>>72722
>>72723
I take it English is not your first language. You might want to put tattoos aside for a bit, just until you've managed to get a hold of the language you're attempting to use.

>>72746
Fuck you ya basketball american ,he can get whatever tattoo he wants on his forearms because he's in control.

>>72734
That looks like the symbol of a second-rate yellow Marvel character from the 70s

>>72746
He doesn't need to be able to speak english to get a tattoo of a symbol...

  I've been listening to Run The Jewels 2 a lot. I want to get "you can all run naked backwards through a field of ds" tatted on my face.

SME Blocked Content in the US

>>72760
No YOU look like the symbol of a second-rate yellow Marvel character from the 70s, you fuckin jabroni shithead.

This is the symbol of Pink Floyd; they control the world of prog rock.

YOU WILL BOW TO THEM

>>73068
Half of them are dead and the other half always hated the "prog rock" label.

>>73079
A lot of prog rock bands were like that. Jethro Tull did an over-the-top proggy album because they were mad that people called them prog rock, and it's one of the best prog rock albums of the golden age.

These cheesy hipsters were so fucking contrarian that they hated people calling them contrarian and liking them for it. I mean sure, "progressive rock" was sort of a pretentious label but compared to everyone else at the time it was also accurate.

Why is prog rock called prog rock?

>>73138
They had to call it something. However, they needed a label in between "pretentious wankers up their own ass with themselves" and "musicians with real talent and training not limiting themselves to banal formulaic bullshit." They picked something in between that makes everyone unhappy, and that's all you can ask for.

>>73159
>>73138
Early on some music writers called it "art rock" which is still a label used today but that is hellza pretentious because it presumes that only that is artsy rock. While some prog rock backs could also be called psychedelic, that was a different phrase which had different connotations, and bands like King Crimson or Jethro Tull weren't hellza psychedelic, at least not all the time.

The harder question is hellza what counts as prog rock bands or albums. Are The Who and Led Zeppelin or even The Beatles prog rock because they occasionally did some proggy stuff? Or does one have to create 25 minute instrumentals in 13/7 time signature in order to be considered progressive?

I could write a 5k word post replying to the last four, but I'm too depressed to argue about music.

Maybe I'll write it and post it on /mu/, sometime.

>>73190
why are you depressed?