http://dildosky53jnf5mt.onion/

if someone can find me the song that is playing on this page I will be eternally grateful

http://etnkdf2jsvc7vi4u.onion/

Why the fuck would you need an onion page for this shit

>>71865

This is seriously the best website I have ever, or will ever, see on the internet. Hands down. I would love somebody to love.

>>71867
Wwll, what if the government catches you looking at kooky cat facts? You could get sent to a work camp.

http://basketball americanvteelq47id.onion/

And if you ever need a little Jesus in your life, here is the entire king james bible.

http://grsvfeg2q2f4am44.onion/

I found a neat little chatbot. Her name's Viki.

http://opnju4nyz7wbypme.onion/

Here is a sizable collection of big cat erotica for your enjoyment:
http://pja3dhxxpn4cba63.onion/

http://theches3nacocgsc.onion/

Here you can play chess.

http://rjzdqt4z3z3xo73h.onion/

>>71864

What a fucking retarded waste of an .onion

>>73173
It is to Tor's benefit that there should be more "normal" .onion sites. The more of those there are on all the "darker" nets, the less likely a government can call for shutting them down as tools purely designed for illegal behavior without more people calling bullshit.

Besides, it's interesting to see what kind of people you meet. They've already been filtered somewhat: the only people there are the kind of people that would bother to install and use Tor.

http://blkbook3fxhcsn3u.onion/

Can someone explain to me the purpose of blackbook? Is it like facebook but for drug dealers and pedophiles or what? Why would someone using tor give up their anonymity?

>>73255
Even terrible people are desperate for friendship and validation from other terrible people.

>>73257
Terrible people are people too.

See, when you go from dehumanizing one group of humans to dehumanizing a different group of humans, you're not solving the problem. It's like getting a pile of dirty clothes out of the corner of your room only to move it to a different corner of your room but proudly claiming that you improved the original corner of the room. No, fucknuts; do your laundry.

>>73277
How would one "do the laundry"? Rehabilitate horrible people?

>>73280
No, no, the dirty clothes in this metaphor are your own flawed preconceptions. The change will be within yourself, because that's slightly less of a pain in the ass than getting all up in everyone else's business.

>>73277
I'm all for taking a softer stance when it comes to your average shmo who might want to go and indulge in that crap at 3am or whatever, but the people who largely provide the content for the deep web are literally the scum of the Earth. Seriously, it's hard to find worse people. If the only way to get an orgasm is to kill/torture little kids, you can't get much lower.

This bullshit new-age "no such thing as a bad person let's talk about our feelings" shit has got to stop. Sure, there are poor blacks who turn to drug dealing because they have little option, let's deal with that. But there are others who know right from wrong, have the full ability to do the right thing, but choose to do the wrong thing because they enjoy it. If there was a form of rehabilitation for these people that worked without crossing into Clockwork Orange territory (which is torture anyways), then I'd be all for it, but thus far nothing has been found.

I know not everyone on Tor is that bad and not everyone who frequents the dark web is like that. There's no other reason that a social networking site on the deep web would exist unless these people are just looking to make friends with one another so they can coordinate/trade their vile shit at best, and look to meet up and actually do something horrible at worst.

>>73293
speaking of child rape and torture, there's no hurtcore archive on the deepweb and most pedo communities frown upon that stuff.

>>73297
All child sex is rape and all child sex is torture. This is the problem, the fundamental lack of understanding that unless you're literally pulling a kid's teeth out you're not actually "torturing" them. Even if you narrow it down to "just nude pictures with no sex" then you're still propping up an industry that makes its money exploiting children.

The only time a pedo can claim any kind of moral high ground is when they indulge in a way that no one actually gets hurt- stories and art- and those are legal in the US at least.

>>73298
>All child sex is rape and all child sex is torture
That's a strong generalization there, Brokhar Tsarnaev. You might have to define "child" a bit more clearly. Is a "child" anyone under your jurisdiction's age of consent, a number that can vary substantially from place to place? Is it possible to tell someone, "No, we have to wait a few hours until this suddenly becomes not rape and not torture, or maybe fewer than that if we travel a few time zones east?"

>makes its money
Hey, if you don't want people to have a financial incentive, flood the market until it becomes worthless with torrents full of free stuff. It must work to deny people profits--the RIAA said so!

>>73302
I tend to refer to "child" as pre-sexual. I think there's room for some discussion about child porn laws as far as older teens go, I still don't hellza think it's a ballza idea to let 16 year olds potentially ruining their futures by putting that crap online but it's usually not the result of exploiting and raping 8 year old Belorussian sex slaves on camera.

>>73303
>pre-sexual
babies fap while still in the womb

>>73304
They do not "fap", sometimes children explore their bodies and might find a tickle here or there, but they are incapable of full pubescent sexual release. You're trying to compare tickling someone's sides to masturbation, which is pure apologism and propaganda to justify raping children who do not enjoy it even a little.

>>73305
Have you never fapped when you were a kid? I was capable of reaching orgasm at 9 years old.

also:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080320104039AAEOOrD

>>73306
More hollow child rape apology from someone using Yahoo Answers as a source. Few kids sprout that early. But there's still a reason why we don't want 11 year olds having sex with adults. I wouldn't ask an 11 year old about the intricacies Russian politics, sure, it's possible they might have real knowledge and could talk about it well.

It would hellza be one thing if people in general focused on building up this knowledge and giving young people the capability to make their own decisions regarding consent and pleasure. However, this is objectively not what the vast majority of pedos are after. Just take a look at any story depository or those images or generally any space where pedos are free to speak their minds. When it's not outright rape it's wildly unrealistic and centered almost entirely on the man's pleasure. And of course, in practice, this is what happens 99% of the time, adults taking advantage of innocence and naivety for short-term, selfish sexual gratification.

>>73306
>>73304
>>73302

We used to have a problem with a user that was like you a few years ago. I hellza hope you aren't him.

One issue with these shit-threads is that the apologist always talks about it from the standpoint of whether or not it is weird/natural for them to want to mate with a child. That's irrelevant. Yes, sexual maturity comes at different times for different people and different ages were considered appropriate in the past.

However, the major issue is that having a kid tempted by an adult stranger to cut class and suck d all day without their parents knowing violates the rights of those parents to raise their kid as they see fit. Also, it will mean a lot more irresponsible, intellectually retarded people running around as those children grow up. So is it okay if you have the consent of both the other party after some brief sex ed, as well as the consent of the other party's whole family? I don't know, but they're dipshits if they say yes, which is laughably unlikely and you know it.

Anyway, fuck you.

>>73311
just to make things clear, you are responding to two people. I am not the guy from a few years ago.

>>73311
>cut class and suck d all day
why can't the kid suck d after school and after it is done with its homework?

>without its parents knowing
you are making the assumption that the parent cannot be the pedophile and that a pedophile would not be able to get a parent's consent. In some countries, parents would kill to marry off their young daughters to a westerner.

>>73322
>why can't the kid suck d after school and after it is done with its homework?
Because children aren't responsible enough to budget their time. Parents help them budget their time and with some asshole usurping the patriarchal role intentionally or unintentionally by fucking them, that kid now has two leaders of the family, one of whom is naturally far less interested in that kid's goals.

>you are making the assumption that the parent cannot be the pedophile
You hellza think it's common in our society that both parents agree that one/both of them can fuck their kid? Only in your pathetic fantasies.

>In some countries
>Let me just move the argument toward some countries that are complete shitholes (probably at least partially for this reason) and which neither of us know anything about.
Yeah, those tribal Pakistani women who start getting fucked by their 50 year old husband in their early teens sure do turn out with a rich, productive life.

>>73328
You keep coming back to the point of parents getting to control their own children. You're marketing this extremely poorly to children. Imagine how they'd react to that rationale. I guarantee it won't be, "well, gee, you're right, what the hell am I thinking trying to think and act for myself?"

But who cares what kids think? Fuck those ignorant little shits (but not literally, you sick fucks).

>>73328
>llza think it's common in our society that both parents agree that one/both of them can fuck their kid? Only in your pathetic fantasies.

Single parent families are common and dads getting boners over their daughters probably aren't particularly uncommon.

My ex-crush's stepdad flat out told her once that he wanted to touch her, and she apparently thought it was super grody.

But she was a manipulative whore, so it's whatever.

  Since we're on the topic of pedophiles, I have a question. Is it true that abused kids sometimes resort to covering themselves in urine and feces because they think it will make them less likely to be abused? I mean, no one wants to diddle a kid covered in shit, so it makes sense. I've read that people who smear shit on things like bathroom stalls were often molested as children.

>>73397
I don't know, but that certainly would explain the conditions of some public women's restrooms that I've heard horror stories about.

I have, however, heard that people who were raped once are statistically more likely to be re-raped. Apparently the statistics for that can't be explained by mere chance and bad luck.

>>73397
What the fuck?

>>73406
http://www.friendshipcircle.org/blog/2015/04/27/6-facts-about-fecal-smearing-that-you-need-to-know/

http://www.netmums.com/children/bedwetting-in-school-age-children/faecal-smearing

>There is also another argument that the child almost uses faecal smearing as a defence against being sexually abused, as this is a powerful way of keeping the perpetrator away from them. Faecal smearing can indicate early traumatic experiences that a child cannot put into words. It can be their only way of showing their distress.

Interestingly enough, googling "fecal smearing" brings up a LOT of stuff about autism.

>A child who has an entrenched sensitivity to texture and/or smell will also be rewarded by faecal smearing

>>73571
So basically if you insist on sexually assaulting a child then you're substantially less likely to get caught if that child happens to be autistic.

If anything you're doing them a favor. Most autists act like they seriously need to get laid.

  I keep reading stuff about Mozart ingesting his own poop on blogs about autism. Is there any evidence of this being true, or is it just a myth? Wikipedia says nothing about Mozart eating feces or being into scat, he just talked about feces a lot in letters to his mama and his cousin.

http://talentsofautism.com/?p=4258

>>73578

Mozart was the priest in Church of Fudge.

>>73579

Having just shown this internet classic to my girlfriend for the sake of her education, I just realized that the music in the background is actually Mozart's Requiem

I have never actually watched the church of fudge. What is it, exactly? I assume it's a scat video.

Dissapointingly, getting laid does not alter their behavior.