>>
|
No. 71983
>>71947
Lately my thoughts on ISIS have basically been as follows: they've become an organized state. They repair roads, of a structure of government, have subsidized oil and agricultural industries, and fund (fucked up) schools. So they're a nation, and their foreign policy is basically killing everyone. I'm not sure why no one has done something about this. Like this is the one legitimate instance for a country to keep a standing army. The threat of violence most countries is minimal but here we have a bonafide rebel nation whose policy harkens back to Roman times. This is like one of those rare moments where it's like "YES, FINALLY, WE CAN MAKE USE OF OUR ARMIES!" But no one is doing that and I was puzzled as to why.
Your post has gave me stuff to think about though. I don't necessarily agree with all of it, but I'll mull it over in time and decide on it. I think it's alarmingly apparent, at the least, that shit is way more fuckey than the media is making it out to be. I think there are some parties who have an interest in seeing ISIS achieve a modicum of success who really shouldn't be interested in that. Which is depressing. I liked to think that most countries had come to a point where they actually put the prevention of violence and suffering one rung above their own worldly gains, but apparently not.
|