Oooookaaay... ??

>>67357

We get it, you don't agree with feminists and liberals. Wonderful. How about you go back to a conservative forum and wank about it over there instead of sticking your metaphorical political belief cock in every thread regardless of the relevance?

>>67357
I know, right? What a bitch! Critiquing narrow roles and shallow portrayals of women in pop culture and speaking publicly about the threats she receives is totally the same as accusing individuals of being rapists! She hates men and wants to destroy videogames!!! Spread the word, brother! #yesallmen

>>67352
Did you think of this while pooping? This is the kind of thing I think about while pooping.

>>67365
>>67366
The sand in your vaginas could make lifesized castles.

>>67383
You're the only one getting worked up here, though.

Oh,I get it. It looks like a peepee lol.

Liberals and feminists are evil, intolerant and cunts. Fuck the liberals, fuck the stupid sand cunt feminists. Women get paid less because they take a fuck ton more time off than men on average, that isn't the mens fault. Women want to be dike fire fighters and front line soldiers while they lack the physical strength or mental strength (testicular fortitude) to possibly deal with the rigors of these occupations. Fuck some stupid fucks who want to destroy any form of freedom or liberty in the US.

>>67390
I'm afraid that's not true at all and such ignorance downplays the actual points made by people who you are seemingly unable to comprehend without becoming all defensive as if you are being personally attacked by these women. Insecurity, immaturity? I don't know.

I had a discussion with a friend and he could understand why the girl had to take a shortcut through the woods, so I drew him this picture. He went on to talk about how that is a strange way to populate, especially for family members.

The wolf also met Riding Hood at some point in the forest, but then had to run to get to grandma's house and do all the things he did before she got there, meaning it must not have been that short a walk.

The discussion came about because I pointed out that it was originally a cautionary tale and Riding Hood and Grandma were not saved in the original version. The question then arose as to what moral and point the story was supposed to tell, and I pointed out because it was supposed to warn kids about the forest. The bigger question is why her mother sent her off alone on such a long walk, regardless of whether or not she went in the forest.

Also, I firmly believe that all men are rapists.

>>67399
Uh, they actually were saved in the original version by a lumberjack.

>>67401
At least try to Wikipedia this shit before you spout non-truths. I mean, come on, guy. You have the internet. The most powerful tool for the exchange of information and porn ever, a miracle of technology and human development.

It started out as a simple folk tale told in many versions, but the first printed version was by Charles Perrault in 1697, and in it the story ends with both grandma and Riding Hood being eaten. The Grimm version of the tale sanitized it a bit and gave it a happy ending with the lumberjack. But old folktales were known for not having happy endings because they were meant to scare/caution children against certain behaviors.

>>67403
Are you sure it wasn't the lumberjack? I don't think you are sure.

>>67404
Well if it were a lumberjack, that would be okay.

>>67401
No, they were raped and eaten by the lumberjack. >>67403 was close but seems to be confused.

The original story was about Greek guys on a sailboat.

>>67399
Does she even have to take a shortcut for the story to work? Wolves are capable of walking on forest paths too.

In this image, the area with orange crosshatching was swampland at the time the road was made, recently the government drained it as part of a scheme to have less swampland so it is now possible to take a shortcut.

>>67436
But wait, doesn't that violate some sort of wetland protection legislation?

Get me the phone, boys! The municipality fucked up ballza this time!

>>67387
Yeah, dude, if you even had half the balls of those "dike fire fighters" you wouldn't be saying that shit. At my fire house, I've met badass female fire fighters, EMT's, paramedics etc. While we are out there doing actual shit that matters, you can just sit here and jerk off about how those vicious females are taking away your video games.

>>67529
That's cool and all but when female soldiers are bitching about discrimination and rape culture or whatever only because they're forced to take out their weave and go through the same training as men it's just ridiculous and silly. I don't care if hair extensions are a time honored Negro cultural tradition or whatever and neither will Mohammed over here when he holds you down by them and rapes you with his sand-covered circimcised jewcock.

>>67534
That would be true only absent the fact that female soldiers are sexually assaulted and are faced with being denied advancement if it's reported, not to mention being ostracized.

>>67545
>female soldiers are sexually assaulted and are faced with being denied advancement if it's reported, not to mention being ostracized.

Then maybe they shouldn't make it any easier to rape them? I'm just being realistic. War is hell, and rape has been a tool of war for thousands of years. So why even offer the opportunity to an enemy combatant who may or may not share your privileged first world concerns for things like the "Geneva Convention" and "human rights"? Take out your damn weave.

>>67558

I'm pretty sure if you're behind enemy lines, completely isolated from your unit, and without any weapons any you, your weave is not going to make the crucial difference between getting raped or not.

>>67558
I'm pretty sure he was talking about within the same military. Also, how many women do you think wear weaves and why do you associate heightened sexual attention and weaves? You're am odd one.