h

h

h

h

h

h

h

a

a

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

NOKO has been used.

a

a

I live for these gifs

How are these effects achieved? Practically, that is. I know it has something to do with removing keyframes and continuing the interpolation.

thank mr. skeltal

>>66671
It's some sort of glitch in the video encoding I think. I've had it happen while I was watching things on VLC. It's strangely interactive.

>>66671
You can do a bunch of things to make these. The first step is going to be to take out some key frames which will break it on its own, like >>66667
, but then to get real wonky things like >>66634
you can start repeating the predictive frames where they don't belong. You could also insert key frames in the incorrect position etc., its just a mix and match game. You can tell the first example really only had key frames taken out because only moving things get glitchy, and they might have taken out the guy's head turning if it was there originally (the prediction could also just be blending to look like he is doing the staring thing though). The second example is definitely filled with extra predictive frames because of how everything gets swirly. My attached file is the opposite, with only key frames left.

In what editor can one selectively remove or insert key frames and predictive frames?

you can open up a jpg in any text editor and just start cutting and pasting chunks of garbled text with some interesting results

and a little photoshop

>>66734
That one just isn't as ballza, not the same as the others. I'm sure there's something else going on that makes them.

>>66811
It's call datamoshing. You take an avi video, compress the fuck out of it, and then edit the frames. Avidemux is a common program to do these types of effects. AVIs are easier to work with than gifs in my opinion.

Stuff like >>66634 is made by pasting a p-frame over and over again. >>66668 is made by editing two videos together and then removing the first i-frame of the second clip. If you edit out all but the first i-frames a video, you get something like >>66664. >>66734 only has i-frames.

>>66633 looks like each frame was individually pixel sorted, a whole different technique.

If you want to know more just google glitch art, databending, or datamoshing tutorial.

>>66811
Having only i-frames/keyframes is like making a flip book and then tearing out a bunch of the pages which is why it doesn't look wonky. The wonkyness in other ones comes from screwing around with the pframes which were generated during compression to fill in the space between the i-frames.

So is sabagebu actually worth watching, OP?

finally got this shit working

>>66932
definitely.