-  [JOIN IRC!]


[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Subject   (reply to 1015)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
¯\(°_O)/¯
  • Supported file types are: BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 400x400 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 354 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2023-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

File 134522770287.jpg - (128.00KB , 240x240 , Music_Pirate_(resub)-mcgrpg-d.jpg )
1015 No. 1015
So I've heard more than once the here in the united states we burn "extra" food to maintain its price and demand. I've been trying to find some info about this online but all my googling just produced wait loss crap. So does this actually happen and if so is there any Wikipedia articles on it or the like?
>> No. 1017
I don't know about physically burning it but some land owners do get paid not to farm.
>> No. 1023
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_subsidy

This is a start.
>> No. 1039
Probably more likely to sit in warehousing and get wasted. If the government "burns" something, it would buy it and then not use it to control the supply. I don't know about that within the US, but I had a professor that gave an example where the US sells rice to Japan (that they don't really want) for whatever reason (bullied into a deal to help us increase exports, appearances, etc., basically a bunch of bullshit) and that the rice goes to waste in storage, but they have to export a certain quota to Japan that then doesn't get used in any capacity.

>>1017
The conservation reserve program, CRP. Conservation first, but it could be market manipulation, too.
>> No. 1040
Cheap foods probably are burned when overproduced. I.e. if the value of the food elsewhere is inferior to the cost to ship it there it may be cheaper to burn the stock, but only if it can't be sold as something else (e.g. animal feed). Storage is an option, but it isn't free either.

I gave Google Scholar ( http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=food+overproduction+burnt&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= ) a shot and found this:
source: http://odin.agr.unideb.hu/AVA3/Beerkezett/Nagy%20Henrietta/AVA%202007%20K%C3%A1poszta%20angol.doc

>In the Czech Republic there is overproduction in wheat, therefore in more and more towns the surplus is burnt to produce heat. Heat is produced from renewable sources for public use in almost 70 Czech towns already, and wheat has also become such source recently because of the great surplus. In a small town called Zlutice, where the population is 3.000, hay is burnt in the local plant. The experiment started 3 years ago, in spite of the opposition of the population. There has been no smoke over the town since then. They abolished the contract with the power plant havin provided energy for the town until that time, and since then dozens of settlements have followed their example. There is a city, where 50% of the demand is fulfilled by the local biomass power plant, because they recognized that it is much cheaper than the traditional heating methods. Primarily not wheat is burnt in these power plants, it has become popular only because of the surpluses. The amount of wheat surplus is estimated at such an amount, which is sufficient for the heating of 400.000 households annually.
>> No. 1075
I suppose they do that elsewhere as well, but in France, they put some product on fishes that have been "over-fished" to make them improper to consumption and avoiding people having them for free in the garbage. Supermarkets do the same with the food they couldn't sell.

What a fucking waste.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason