Posting mode: Reply
CAPTCHA   (enter the text below)
Embed   (paste a YouTube URL)
Password   (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are JPG, PNG, GIF and WEBM.
  • Maximum file size allowed is 12 MB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 219 unique user posts.

File: 1520126482770.png–(144.21KB, 447x639, cipriani1.png)
>Toxic masculinity also poses a major threat to humanity. Consider that the over-whelming number of interstate and civil wars, terrorist attacks, rampage shootings, serialkillings, homicides, assaults, rapes, cases of domestic violence and cruelty to animals, andhate crimes are perpetrated by men.13 (The only category of crime that women consis-tently have higher arrest rates for is prostitution.) Carl Sagan, following Alan Alda, warnsabout the prevalence of “testosterone poisoning,” which can lead to aggression and violence.Similarly, David Pearce (2012) writes thatthe single greatest underlying risk to the future of intelligent life isn’t technological, butboth natural and evolutionarily ancient, namely competitive male [dominance] behaviour.Crudely speaking, evolution “designed” human male primates to be hunters/warriors.

>Adultmale humans are still endowed with the hunter-warrior biology—and primitive psychol-ogy—of our hominin ancestors. For the foreseeable future, all technological threats mustbe viewed through this sinister lens. Last century, male humans killed over 100 million fel-low humans in conflict and billions of nonhumans. Directly or indirectly, this century weare likely to kill many more. But perhaps we’ll do so in more sophisticated ways.

>It is considerations like these that lead Persson and Savulescu (2011) to argue for moralbioenhancement interventions that target men in particular. As they write, “if it is rightthat women are more altruistic than men, it seems that we could make men in generalmore moral by making them more like women by biomedical methods, or rather, more likethe men who are more like women in respect of empathy and aggression.” I have elsewherecriticized Persson and Savulescu’s moral bioenhancement thesis (Torres 2017a); nonetheless,such criticisms don’t detract from the important point that women, who are consistentlyunderrepresented in decisions to start wars and make peace, should play a much larger rolein shaping the developmental trajectory of civilization. In fact, one study suggests thatthe only variable that is directly and positively correlated with the “collective intelligence”of groups (analogous to psychometric g in individuals) is the number of women within thegroup—i.e., the more women, the smarter the collective (Woolley et al. 2010). It followsthat insofar as mitigating existential risk is a group activity, the community should wantmore women scholars.

What makes a good man?
¨ No.925
A good, hard cock and a welcoming anus make for a nice man.
¨ No.938
It always seemed to make sense to me that one day women would just kind of do away with men. Some old civilizations gave leadership positions to women, and most of them were pretty chill, but they never lasted long because other civilizations were all violent because dudes. You could say male-dominated civilization build a lot of stuff and made advancements, but so much of it was wiped away and destroyed by constant warring, which always came about because of dick-measuring rather than mutual benefit. Dick-measuring can itself be a motivator to progress, but it's a rather imperfect one at best.

So we needed big manly aggressive dick-contesting men to get out of the cave and start building and subsequently destroying stuff in neverending dick contests to get where we're at now, but as the destructive power of our weapons increases the dick-measuring contests will go from a few towns getting crucified to the threat of human extinction.

Really we could just lower the overall male population to 30% or so, so that men are still around but women would almost necessarily run things.
¨ No.941
Remember: gender essentialism is always wrong when it calls women stupid, but always right when it calls men stupid.

If you kill all men because men are violent, you'll just get violent women. Violence will never magically quit being useful for getting what you want.
¨ No.970

Fucking format your shit after you copy-paste, sheezus.
¨ No.987
There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. It's relative... The most innocuous and previously normal male "things" are now "seen" as unusual or bad... Feminism, the destroyer of worlds, is the cause and that much is well documented, proven beyond a shadow of a doubt and just fucking common sense. Feminism is dogma, modern day zealotry with vagina "power" and the color pink everywhere until even the walking vaginas start puking. Feminism first "started" in the most recent incarnation / iteration as a community
/ socialist (I conflate the two because they are so retarded that they didn't know if they liked Trotsky or Stalin...).

"Progressiveism" is a disease and is also fascism, also since the ratio of liberal to conservative educators is 473284732 to one, all of our children and college age kids are fucking retarded, with reasoning skills / logic that's about as good as shit mixed with diesel fuel, it is fucking retarded, they have been retardified due to the shit stain teachers being liberal nazi cucks. Seriously, when will liberals stop rewriting history and changing their narrative when it suits them and fucking us normal (and the majority of Americans) conservative people?
¨ No.988
Bro, women are fucking retarded. Collectively they are just materialistic fuck bags who don't even know what they want outside of doing AS MUCH damage as is possible, to everything. Don't forget, women, communists and the whole feminism thing is running our countries. Do you see ample conversational space for conservatives EVEN THOUGH conservatives are the fucking majority, by large margins??? Fuck this planet, I don't want to live here anymore.
¨ No.992
1521126762934.gif–(472.33KB, 480x270, b354c94cd0ce8d702a77a6ddc3087e46.gif)
For someone so "right" and in the majority, you seem awfully angry and insecure. You'd think controlling the government and being such a clear righteous majority would mellow you out a little but nope. You mad because your Big Orange Daddy wants to censor your video games and state-murder you for selling drugs like communist China? Hmm?

You're exactly the reason why men suck, all you wanna do is cry and try to kill all da commie pinko fascist feminazis because you can't get laid/have a small penis/whatever. All you want is a nice strong daddy to hold you and tell you everything's gonna be fine while he fucks you with his own cheeto dick. You throw your toys at mommy whenever she comes in and tries to tell you to clean your room and eat your vegetables. No, you can't have a $30/hr no-skill manufacturing job like your grandpa because Reagan killed unions long ago, go to school little one.

The only place pathetic little cucks like you are in the "majority" are in the middle east, Africa, and smattering around Asia. Third-world shitholes where the tribes are fighting centuries-old wars over nothing, and the men don't mind because none of them can have sex anyway. Just a pit of insecure male anger where feminism never existed. Perfect place for you, get your fill, the rest of us will focus on actual problems and how to move civilization forward, not debating how to bring the 1940s back.

The reason why anyone who reads a fucking book and studies history for any amount of time comes to the same conclusion is because it's obvious. Men have ruled the world, all they've given us is "conservative" totalitarian shitholes where 95% of dirty peasants had to prop up an insecure despot or manchild. Capitalism was created as a way to continue this system of exploitation, just without the divine rule. It worked well for a little while when we had strong labor unions to balance out the fuckheadery but then the extreme capitalists killed those off by brainwashing people into blaming unions instead of the elite when the elite shipped jobs overseas. And all during the ages, men have started wars and perpetrated genocides for no good reason, and because you're way too young to actually fucking see with your own eyes what a real war looks like, you romanticize the ones in the past. Only problem is now a real war would wipe out most of humanity, which those of us who actually don't want to see the world burn want to prevent, so we focus more on keeping toxic right-wing extremists like you out of office than making sure Muslims and transgenders can't use the bathroom or whatever Breitbart is commanding you to believe this hour.

If you don't get it you're just like the kid in kindergarten who doesn't "get" the letter E. It's not my fault that kid's not the smart one. If we all don't get incinerated over one elderly man's ego and actually get to experience the Age of Woman, you might find yourself better off, even if you won't be handed a miserable bride on your 18th birthday to rape and abuse as you wish.
¨ No.993
lol is this copypasta
¨ No.996
im gay
¨ No.997

Delete Post