>>535
YES. This fucking shit right here.

All the absurdist anti-logic aside, the really hilarious thing is they absolutely refuse to believe ANYTHING reported in the "mainstream" (read: credible) media, unless it agrees with their views. If CNN or Fox broke a story about Obama being a heroin addict, or Romney being a child molester, these motherfuckers would believe it instantly.

Most of them are Ron Paul fans, which makes 'em even worse. Back in the '90s these motherfuckers were laughed at all up and down the block. But nowadays, they have a semi-legitimate Presidential candidate to coalesce around, and it's actually convinced them that they're worthy of being taken seriously.

FUCK YOU IN YOUR FUCKING DELUSIONAL ASSES. THERE IS NO GRAND CONSPIRACY. GET A FUCKING JOB.

Also, this: http://www.theonion.com/articles/conspiracy-theorist-has-elaborate-explanation-for,1917/

You've both ruined my rage session.

At least I can thank you both SO FUCKING MUCH. YES.

FUCK I KNOW, FUCK.

ITS WORSE WITH PEOPLE WHO'VE BEEN TO COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY. HOW CAN YOU BE SO FUCKING STUPID AS TO HAVE SUCH AN ABSURDLY IGNORANT WORLD VIEW AFTER YEARS OF LEARNING HOW THE WORLD WORKS. THERE IS A SYSTEM TO THE ENTIRETY OF HUMANITY. MAYBE NOT A LINEAR ONE THAT IS CONSTANTLY IMPROVING, BUT A SYSTEM NONETHELESS.

PLUS THE SIMPLE FACT THAT HUMAN BEINGS LACK THE ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS TO ORCHESTRATE A GLOBAL CONSPIRACY. SERIOUSLY LOOK AT GROUPS OF PEOPLE IN THEIR NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS. IN FACT LOOK AT YOURSELVES, CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, AND HOW STUPID YOU ARE. IF HUMAN BEINGS CAN BE THIS PHENOMENALLY IGNORANT HOW WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE FOR ANY GROUP OF PEOPLE TO DO ALL THIS CONSPIRACY SHIT?

the tempestuous panopticon
beneath once bright glorious empire
the endless cascades of magnificent iron sky
above oscillates technological concinnity
internecine mortar light waves like vermillion blanket
crescendo of distant euphoric sonicbooms ripple through the firmament
bristling holes in the dark ooze lamentation of dead end
such nihilistic decadence
jaded with facade of sanity

>>561
I am going to find you, take a chainsaw, and FUCK THE SHIT OUT OF YOUR CHEST.

So there is no unnecessary fluoride or other additives in our water?

>>538
(read: credible)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hx_4mBZBjk
Remember when they made you believe that the tea party and occupy wall street were idiots? Yeah.

>>585

They are idiots. They may have some serious complaints but they're too stupid to articulate themselves.

I'm so fucking sick of all the "hurr duur, aliens did it" shit. every fucking time one of these goddamn morons can't figure out how something was made, it's suddenly aliens!

These fuckers would rather have the delusional acid-trip hypothesis of flying saucers making the pyramids than the fact that, using fairly simple technology and a number of years time, we made the fucking pyramids. But NO, these morons deliberately pull the wool over their own eyes.

Their view of ancient times boils down to this: #1- All humans before modern times were complete retards who didn't have brains to solve problems. #2- Anything that proves that our ancestors were smart is proof of aliens visiting us.

LISTEN YOU FUCKING IDIOTIC, SELF-ABSORBED, PSEUDO-INTELLECTUALS, YOU ONLY PARROT OFF THESE "CONSPIRACIES" AND "LOST KNOWLEDGE" TO PRETEND TO BE SMARTER THAN A GODDAMNED LUMP OF ALFALFA. WELL, IT'S NOT WORKING, FEATHERDICK! EVERYONE SEES THROUGH YOUR LAZY ATTENTION-WHORING BULLSHIT!

Oh hey, and while we're fucking at it: you fuckwits claiming that there is a massive conspiracy, and that you'r lives are in danger from "revealing the truth". If any of your fucking delusional shit were actually real YOU'D BE DEAD, end of fucking story!

What a bunch of melodramatic attention whores. Give me a room filled with the biggest conspiracy theorist and a fucking shovel so I can beat them to death! Let me bash their unused brains into a fucking bloody pulp, while their delusional "look at me!" followers come up with conspiracies to the "Shovel-Head Incident"!

>>586
Which ones are idiots? The people they interview on television?
You guys are calling everyone else dumb. But you can not understand or admit how the media will go to a town square filled with twenty thousand people, and cherry-pick the ten most confused or ignorant ones to be interviewed. And then the station repeats their(the station's) message hundreds of times in a single day until you believe it.
When that man who was holding a child starts speaking she immediately tries to cut him off. And it looks like the guy with the flag was trying to run interference? I bet he drives the news van.

>>587
We have no idea how the pyramids, stonehenge, and many other things came into existence. But yeah, ancient aliens is full of shit. I will definitely agree with that.
>using fairly simple technology and a number of years time,
elaborate

>We have no idea how the pyramids, stonehenge, and many other things came into existence.

Of course we know how the pyramids, stonehenge, and other things came into existence you twit. PEOPLE BUILT THEM! All three pyramids were build over a 30-40 year period by skilled Egyptian stonemasons and or journeymen and Stonehenge was constructed as a ritual site similar to its nearby cousin Woodhenge and the two are theorized to have some sort of symbolic connection to birth and death.

>All three pyramids were build over a 30-40 year period by skilled Egyptian stonemasons and or journeymen
How do you know they were built in 30-40 years?
Only three pyramids?
>and Stonehenge was constructed as a ritual site similar to its nearby cousin Woodhenge and the two are theorized to have some sort of symbolic connection to birth and death.
How did they move the massive stones? With a forktruck?
If you respond: "We do not know how they moved the stones."
then you can not say that it/they were erected by people, because you have evidence of neither.

>>592
The three great pyramids were constructed under the commission of pharaoh Kufu or Cheops to the Greeks; we know this because of various records found in both cultures. The first constructed and the smallest was for himself (the three less famous ones constructed in its shadow were for his wives), the second and largest was for his son, and the third was for his father.

The stones at Stonehenge were pulled across a set of logs so they could roll them there as it is the only technologically viable technique to get them there.

>>587
>What a bunch of melodramatic attention whores. Give me a room filled with the biggest conspiracy theorist and a fucking shovel so I can beat them to death! Let me bash their unused brains into a fucking bloody pulp, while their delusional "look at me!" followers come up with conspiracies to the "Shovel-Head Incident"!

Mmm... that's good rage. Rock the fuck on, brother.

>>592
Oh, for fuck's sake. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. Most of this conspiracy theory shit starts out as pseudo-intellectual posturing, with faggots using some twisted version of the scientific method / critical thinking. "How do you know the Statue of Liberty was constructed by humans? Did you see it? How do you know William McKinley was assassinated by Leon Czolgosz? Were you there?" etc., etc. FUCK YOURSELF WITH AN IRON STICK. Try using some basic logic and reading some actual history. Many historians disagree on how the pyramids and stonehenge were constructed, but nearly all agree that they could have been and fucking were constructed by humans using the technology available to them in that era. We're talking scientists, historians, architects and archaeologists who've devoted their fucking LIVES to this shit, not some faggot who's read some websites and watched some YouTube videos on the subject.

Seriously, why are you doing this? What's your endgame here? I could understand if you were one of those quacks on the History Channel trying to promote your new book or documentary and make some money, but you're just a guy on the internet. Why are you trying to convince people aliens built the pyramids?

Oh, wait, I know. BECAUSE LIKE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, YOU LOVE THE MENTAL MASTURBATION THAT COMES WITH KNOWING WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON WHILE ALL OF THE REST OF US "SHEEPLE" WALLOW IN OUR IGNORANCE. YOU JERK OFF TO THE FACT THAT YOU'RE SMART ENOUGH TO HAVE FIGURED OUT THE "TRUTH". BUT IT'S LONELY UP THERE, ISN'T IT, DOUCHE? SO YOU FEEL COMPELLED TO "WAKE UP" US SHEEP SO YOU'LL HAVE SOME COMPANY. THEN YOU TREAT US LIKE WE'RE IGNORANT CHILDREN WHEN WE DON'T ACCEPT THE VERSION OF EVENTS THAT YOU READ ON THE INTERNET AND NOW WORSHIP AS GOSPEL. YOU ARE THE WORST TYPE OF ELITIST PRICK AND I PRAY THAT YOU DIE OF AIDS.

>>595
>The stones at Stonehenge were pulled across a set of logs so they could roll them there as it is the only technologically viable technique to get them there.
Okay. How did they stand them up then? And how did they stack those big stones on top?
I am in no way, nor have I ever implied that aliens or anything else extraordinary was/were involved. But you guys seem to have all of the answers. So come forth.

>>596
>Most of this conspiracy theory shit starts out as pseudo-intellectual posturing, with faggots using some twisted version of the scientific method / critical thinking.
Nothing pseudo intellectual about my post. You are just mad.
>"How do you know the Statue of Liberty was constructed by humans?
I would never say that. We have videos of it being constructed. And we have the tools and the means to do such things.
>Many historians disagree on how the pyramids and stonehenge were constructed, but nearly all agree that they could have been and fucking were constructed by humans using the technology available to them in that era.
But you seem to how they did it. At least that is how you are acting.
>We're talking scientists, historians, architects and archaeologists who've devoted their fucking LIVES to this shit,
And they still don't know!

>Oh, wait, I know. BECAUSE LIKE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, YOU LOVE THE MENTAL MASTURBATION THAT COMES WITH KNOWING WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON WHILE ALL OF THE REST OF US "SHEEPLE" WALLOW IN OUR IGNORANCE. YOU JERK OFF TO THE FACT THAT YOU'RE SMART ENOUGH TO HAVE FIGURED OUT THE...
Assumptions everywhere. I am sure there are plenty of people like that. But you are making assumptions about me. I never gave any explanation for how that shit was built and presented it as fact.

You guys do not see how hypocritical you are.
>dumb conspiracy theorists think they know every damn thing!
(goes on to explain how he knows everything)

>>604
>>605
Your posts are literally nothing more than pseudo-intellectual bullshit. The fact that theories are incomplete neither gives others more credence nor does it invalidate the original one. Also, going after people who repeatedly admit that they don't know everything for not knowing everything really only makes you look like a retard and/or an ass.

SAGE has been used.

>>604
Who said anyone knew all the answers about Stonehenge? I just said that we know enough to, for certain, know that it was build by human beings and no one else.

The only somewhat impressive stuff is that I know all the "need to know" answers about the pyramids; not everything but enough to be mildly impressive/a buzz kill at parties.

>>605
>But you are making assumptions about me.

Notice you did NOTHING to refute my entire rant at the end there. I'm going to assume because it's all true.

So tell me, enlighten me. Why are you on the internet implying that humans didn't build Stonehenge? What's your theory? And how many times did you cum while explaining it?

>>605

WHAT'S SO HARD ABOUT FUCKING PULLING AND MANIPULATING STONES YOU CUMGUZZLER ?

DO YOU HAVE VIDEOS OF ANY MEDIEVAL BUILDING BEING BUILT? THERE AREN'T ANY VIDEO THAT I FUCKED EVERYTHING DEAR TO YOU, THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

THE STONES ON TOP ? HOW ABOUT THIS YOU DICKWIPE ? YOU ERECT THE VERTICAL STONES, PUT THE SHITLOAD OF DIRT MAKING A SLOPE TO THE TOP AND JUST PULLED THE FUCKER UP, WITH NO TECHNOLOGY WHATSOEVER ?

>>606
>Also, going after people who repeatedly admit that they don't know everything for not knowing everything really only makes you look like a retard and/or an ass.
You guys never said anything remotely like :"admit that they don't know everything for not knowing everything"
In almost all of the previous posts, you guys made claims as to exactly how all of that shit was built.
>>607
>Who said anyone knew all the answers about Stonehenge?
I said it. Because apparently you do:
>I just said that we know enough to, for certain, know that it was build by human beings and no one else.
If you can't see what I am getting at here, I apologize.
>>611
I do not have to refute anything there. I said that you were making assumptions. And before you try to argue with that or make a snappy come-back, notice that in post 611 you actually say:
"I'm going to assume because it's all true."
>Why are you on the internet implying that humans didn't build Stonehenge?
I never implied that humans did not build stonehenge. The only claim I made was that we most likely don't know how they did it.
>And how many times did you cum while explaining it?
Like I said in a previous post, you are a fucking hypocrite. I haven't given an explanation for anything. But explanations and facts somehow abound in this thread.

I think that what you are calling psuedo-intellectual: maybe it just came off snobby because I never presented any theories, only doubts.

>>628
then add what you would think. What causes you to severely doubt the construction methods of Stonehenge by a period appropriate methods?

>>628
> maybe it just came off snobby because I never presented any theories, only doubts.

Maybe it's because no one here can figure out your endgame. Are you going to pull your vast Conspiracy Theory to Rule Them All out at the last second, telling us that time-traveling nomads from post-apocalyptic Australia built the pyramids? Or are you just playing Devil's Advocate? And if the latter, WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING THAT ON /RAEG/ YOU PIECE OF HORNY GOAT SHIT.
YOU ARE NOT THE ARBITER. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO STAND TO THE SIDE, ATTEMPTING TO CUT DOWN ARGUMENTS IN THE MOST PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE WAY POSSIBLE ("I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying..."). GET A FUCKING OPINION OR GET THE FUCK OUT. AT LEAST IF YOU WERE A CONSPIRACY NUT, WE'D KNOW WHERE YOU STAND. AS OF NOW, YOU'RE A DISEASED CHOAD HANGING FROM THE SCROTUM OF AN AIDS-INFESTED BABOON.

GO SUCK A DICK, CAMEL-FUCKER.

>>632
This guy gets it.

Also, >>628, you don't have to repost and respond to EVERY FUCKING SENTENCE INDIVIDUALLY. Why are conspiracy fucks so OCD? Take that determination and drive you have, and go the fuck to college. Specifically, take some courses in logic and critical thinking. You might actually learn something.

>>585
>Remember when they made you believe that the tea party and occupy wall street were idiots?

Made me believe?! What the fuck, "made"? Both groups ARE still fucking idiots. Of course you'd post a youtube video as a response. That's what you conspiracy dipshits do.

>>630
I do not doubt that it was built by humans. Was there something extraordinary involved? Maybe.
All I ever said was that we do not know exactly how it was built.

>>632
I thought the whole point of the original post was to criticize people making wild claims?
I will give that whole passive, aggressive thing some consideration. Maybe that is indicative of my whole personality.
But you want a conspiracy theory. So here you go.
I think Ron Paul received more of the popular vote in the republican primaries than the other candidates. I think the majority of people who cared enough to vote, liked the things Ron Paul had to say. And yes the media tried to shut him down. And yes all kinds of other underhanded things were probably done. Everywhere one of the other candidates visited they were greeted by Ron Paul supporters. But we are supposed to believe that he didn't receive any votes? And I like how not every television personality is bought and paid for. One thing I especially liked was Ron Paul's appearances on the tonight show.
Now since the media and some fraudulent pollsters were lying about how successful Paul was in each primary/caucus, him and his supporters were claiming they had a chance using some kind of delegate strategy. No doubt, Ron Paul probably had the most delegates too.
But is Ron Paul on the take too? He withdraws from the race days before the primaries in the two freest states in the union(Texas and California), then one news outlet quietly claims that Romney has received enough delegates to guaranty the nomination.(something they previously claimed no delegate could accomplish) And nothing else is said about it.
I used to listen to all of the AM radio talk shows. It would piss me off how hard they were trying to suppress Ron Paul. It was like they had to say "Well we all know he won't be elected." or some variation of that every five minutes, for fear of losing their jobs. Yet every time a person would call in to one of the shows, all they would want to talk about was Ron Paul.

Mayan 2012 prophecy
Let me preface this by saying that I do not doubt that celestial beings/objects, the solar system etc influence the earth and our physical and mental health.
But what is the mayan 2012 prophecy? Oh wait. Okay it's just a calender right? I call bullshit. Where is the evidence for any of that shit?
Remember y2k? You saw how people were acting because of that stuff. And that rumor was only going around for about a month. They've been preaching this 2012 bullshit for two years now. Complete with a John Cusack movie.
What is even moreso funny about this is that there really is a scheme by these rich folks to keep you unhappy. It's not enough for them just to be rich. They want you to live a short and unhappy life. As we get closer to the 2012 bullshit, and prices keep rising while wages keep falling, you are going to see people become even more agitated. It is already this way. Watch how people behave on your lunchbreak. People are unhappy as fuck.

And yeah, Alex Jones and his site are probably some kind of cointelpro.
And it's pretty obvious that somebody is fucking with the weather/air
Hate me if you want. I do not give a fuck.

>>635
These motherfuckers go to a park with twenty thousand people in it. Then they spend a week looking for the ten least intelligent or most ill informed ones, and that is what they present to the Public.
>Made me believe?! What the fuck, "made"?
Yeah. If you have ever called them occutards or made comments about macbooks and starbucks, then I think you drank the kool-aid

>>637
What would you define as extraordinary? The stones show no evidence of unrelated or extra-technological involvement in their crafting and movement. There is no clear reason to doubt that period appropriate human beings were the only people responsible for constructing Stonehenge.

I think a lot of conspiracy believers get caught up in an undeserved sense of superiority that stops them from accepting the fact that earlier "savages" were capable of great architectural feats. There are almost no conspiracies surrounding the construction of Greek and Roman monuments mostly because we have a strong documentation of their societies as well as a deification of Roman/Greek society that came out of the Renaissance.

>>639
Give it up already. I never said humans did not build stonehenge.

>>640
You implied that something beyond normal was involved in the process of building Stonehenge in human origin or otherwise. I'm not even saying that you believe in aliens or are a proponent of conspiracy; I'm saying that your doubts as to the origin of Stonehenge are completely unfounded.

> You implied that something beyond normal was involved in the process of building Stonehenge in human origin or otherwise.
you got me there. I did imply that.
>I'm not even saying that you believe in aliens or are a proponent of conspiracy;
thank you
>I'm saying that your doubts as to the origin of Stonehenge are completely unfounded.
you might be right. again.

I'm a little frustrated by this because I could not care less about stonehenge. no offense meant.