weren't you banned for making your other thread in this exact same format? or is that amazing red text for something else.

SAGE has been used.

>>733
Thanks for the headsup

>>695
Man up, bitch. Contrary to what you think, no one is judging you based on your abnormally small wang, that's just your own self-loathing for having one.

>>696

Look who enjoys erotic manly company while pissing.

>>705
You don't?

SAGE has been used.

AT LEAST BE GRATEFUL THE MOTHERFUCKER FLUSHED.

It gets worse. Sometimes I go into a stall and there's piss on the seat. if you're not going to use a urinal, have the decency to lift the fucking seat up!

>>674

>as a child.
>now in my late teens

YOU'RE STILL A CHILD!

Man I was like that as a kid too. I'd make shit up every single day in the cafeteria before school began. But you know what? You can't be a kid forever, so you need to learn how to adapt or survive

Personally, I am in that hump area where I'm not able to fully impress my visions onto paper, but I'm steadily making my way over it

Maybe you should just take more writing classes, you little bitch

This might sound retarded, but I suggest you go play with your old toys. Maybe seeing your story in action will help you. Grab a batman action figure, grab Sailor Moon, make them talk to each other and see where your brain takes you from there.

>MORE THAN ANYTHING, I WANT TO TELL THE WORLD SOMETHING, BUT I CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT SOMETHING IS.

Hahaha, what in the fuck. Get out of here loser.

what do you want to write?

Oh wow, now you're bitching about some dude on a forum? How pathetic is your life that the only things you have to cry about are your parents, and random schmucks on the internet?
Go find something to truly be angry about, you impotent fuckbag.

>>718

I will rage about what makes me mad, and there's nothing you can do to stop me.

>>430

FUCKING UTAAAAAH

>>641
FUCK YOU, YOU MINDLESS PIECE OF BRAINWASHED SHIT! *ANY* FUCKING THING YOU EAT IS FUCKING BAD FOR YOU IF YOU STUFF YOUR FACE-HOLE WITH METRIC FUCK-TONS OF IT! IT'S NOT FUCKING DEVIL-CORN OR BIG INDUSTRY THAT IS TURNING AMERICANS INTO JABBA THE HUTT CLONES- IT'S THE FACT GODDAMN NEAR NONE OF THE FATTIES OR FUTURE-FATTIES HAS THE FUCKING BRAINS OR WILLPOWER TO EAT IN GOD-DAMNED *MODERATION*! ESPECIALLY NOT IN THE UNITED STATES! THE ENTIRE FUCKING NATION IS OPERATING UNDER THE RIDICULOUS ASSUMPTION THAT THAT MORE IS BETTER. AND LETS NOT FORGET THE "LET'S BLAME EVERYONE ELSE EXCEPT OURSELVES FOR EVERYTHING" WHINY-FUCKER VICTIM MENTALITY.

BUT PLEASE, GO ON WITH YOUR "OH MY GOD, CORN SYRUP, SAVE ME, WAHHHH!" BULLSHIT. i HOPE YOU GET HIT BY A SEMI TRUCK HAULING ORGANIC SUGARCANE, YOU DOLT!

>>660

WAIT, YOU THINK I'M COMPLAINING ABOUT CORN BECAUSE IT MAKES PEOPLE FAT?
YOU ASSUME I AM A TWEAKER, AND THEN YOU ASSUME I STUFF MY FACE TO THE POINT OF MORBID OBESITY LIKE THE REST OF THE POPULATION THAT I LOATHE AND BITCH ABOUT? YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW VERY MUCH ABOUT TWEAKERS /OR/ THE FOOD INDUSTRY, YOU SORRY SHIT-FOR-BRAINS CORN FREAK

COME ON.
I KNOW YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THAT.

>>698
Nah, I already said I was going to. :)

Because humans is a successful lifeform, an therefore have an easy time multiplying.

>>685
Because you won't just fucking move to the forest or some where we won't have to deal with your antisocial ass.

Because no one has the fucking balls to neutron-bomb the most densely-populated cities in the world like they should, OP.

MAYBE INSTEAD OF BEING A RACIST PRICK YOU COULD APPROACH THE SITUATION SO THAT THE BLACK PEOPLE CAN LEAVE SO THAT YOU CAN FUCKING PLAY WITH YOUR DOGS

YOU WHINY CUNT

>>656

GIVEN MY KNOWLEDGE OF THE SORTS THAT HANG OUT IN PARKS AND LEAVE TRASH EVERYWHERE, I THINK YOU'RE BEING WAY TOO GENEROUS WITH THE TERM 'BLACK PEOPLE.'

EVEN OP GOT THEM TO LEAVE, THEY WOULD STILL LEAVE THEIR SHIT EVERYWHERE, THEREBY DESTROYING HIS DOG PARK EXPERIENCE VIA THEIR NIGGING.

>>581
I'm not denying "customer rights", I just actually now how industries like this work.

For starters, comparing video games to cars is completely fallacious for many reasons, chief among them:
1) A car degrades over time where as a video game doesn't.
2) The "usefulness" of a car lowers depending on how many people use it (both in a given moment and over time) where as a video game doesn't.
3) Cars are an ongoing transaction. Just because you bought a car doesn't mean you aren't going to stop paying for it (even if you did paid the full price up front). Even if you're lucky enough to just have to maintain it, you'll end up paying quite a bit (depending on how long you have it). Often buying a used one means you'll have to pay again sooner and/or at a higher rate of time. This isn't so with video games.

Also, like it or not, buying a game in no way gives you ownership over it. All you did is buy an experience under guidelines which you agreed to when you gave whoever your money for it. This is true for every artistic medium including sculptures and paintings. You can bitch about it all you want, but a situation where your access to something can't be potentially cut off simply won't exist

>>649
1. Physical copies do degrade over time. They suffer scratches easily.
2. Games devalue over time just like cars. You can probably buy a lot of PS2 JRPGs (only one system ago) for a couple bucks.
3. I will give you this for cars, but not for any other media that exists.

Really, I think it's more apt to compare it to movies like >>523 did.
Or how about music? Lets assume people actually bought music.

You buy a CD. Most albums used to have 10-12 songs on them, but these days they only have 2-3 and cost just as much if not more. You can't listen to it until you go online to activate it and you can't borrow a CD from a friend because you can only use the activation key once.
In the middle of every couple songs, you get a Pandora commercial, but it's not in between songs, it's right in the middle of them.
When you get to the end of the short album, you're asked to pay more for additional special songs not included on the album itself. The cost for the addition song is half as much as the entire album was.

This is why it's bullshit.

Also about the PC vs console thing, you really can buy a pc that can run most games for about 400. It's not too much more than a console and saves a lot of money in games in the long run.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>650
financially, maybe. but it can still come down to preference. and no offense to you, but those pc gamers who constantly say things like, "WHY WOULD YOU USE A CONSOLE?" are the assholes i hate. the ones who can't understand that them liking pc games for whatever reason is their preference, and what i do is mine.

honestly, i don't even complain about the price of games. i'm just grateful the prices in the U.S. aren't like those in Australia or other places.

SAGE has been used.

>>648
What pissed me off about this video is his misuse of the term "clip".
It's a fucking magazine, you imbecile.

>>649

So you DO think you pay 60$ to rent it?! Also agreeing to the "guidelines" is bullshit without a contract, the point at which you agree to guidelines is when you agree to the terms and conditions. Also your argument can be boiled down to "I'm nor denying customer rights, they just don't have any!". Then as >>650 mentioned CDs do in fact degrade over time even if they aren't used; Sure it takes a long time but try to use a CD a few decades from now. No matter how well you stored it by then it would be useless. Then there's the whole "how the industry works" bullshit, it hasn't worked that way and it shouldn't ever work that way. Maybe the "way it works" now should be that the game self-destructs the moment you purchase it 49 out of 50 times and you just have to purchase it again and again until you get a copy that DOESN'T explode only to find that it's the shiiest quality game you'd ever played in your entire god damn life but you'd better not complain because then you'd be a whiny and entitled asshole all like "I wanted the inordinate amount of money I spent purchasing this thing so many times over to have a working copy to mean getting a game that IS NOT a metaphor for the soul sucking vicariousness of hyper consumerism and social defeatism that is my life!". You and people like you are one of the many reasons why we can't have nice things, fuck you.

Oh don't get me started. I tried to install some software I might be using for work. To install it, I needed to install the Microsoft Windows SDK. So, I download the installer and run it. It gives me an error message telling me to look at a folder it didn't create. Google tells me to edit some registry files, which I do. No dice. Eventually I find a Stack Overflow post telling me to uninstall VC++, you know, the part of the SDK I was supposed to need. But no, the shit I need to install doesn't work without the full SDK.

So I download the installer for VC++, and uninstall it, then I try to install the SDK. Still the same fucking error. I find out that there's VC++ Express, which contains what you need to use VC++, and the vc_redist_x64.exe that will let me actually uninstall VC++. So, I download that and try again. I get the SAME FUCKING ERROR MESSAGE. I look back at the Express installer, and find out that every time I try to install the SDK, it's getting reinstalled. So, I uninstall it again, uninstall the x64 thing again, and try to install the SDK. Guess what happens now? THE SAME FUCKING ERROR TELLING ME TO LOOK AT A FILE THAT IT DIDN'T MAKE. Finally I find out that there's a vc_redist_x86 that is the other half of the VC++ back-end that goes along with vc_redist_x64, VC++ Express, and the Microsoft Windows SDK.

So, in total, I had to download five different installers, uninstall-then-reinstall-differently three things from my computer, just to be able to install the ONE FUCKING PROGRAM THAT I WANTED TO USE. That shit took up half my day because Microsoft is too fucking lazy to make an installer that can fucking LOOK at what's already fucking installed and too greedy to let other people bundle the software that they let you download for free.

Fucking Microsoft indeed.

>>635
These motherfuckers go to a park with twenty thousand people in it. Then they spend a week looking for the ten least intelligent or most ill informed ones, and that is what they present to the Public.
>Made me believe?! What the fuck, "made"?
Yeah. If you have ever called them occutards or made comments about macbooks and starbucks, then I think you drank the kool-aid

>>637
What would you define as extraordinary? The stones show no evidence of unrelated or extra-technological involvement in their crafting and movement. There is no clear reason to doubt that period appropriate human beings were the only people responsible for constructing Stonehenge.

I think a lot of conspiracy believers get caught up in an undeserved sense of superiority that stops them from accepting the fact that earlier "savages" were capable of great architectural feats. There are almost no conspiracies surrounding the construction of Greek and Roman monuments mostly because we have a strong documentation of their societies as well as a deification of Roman/Greek society that came out of the Renaissance.

>>639
Give it up already. I never said humans did not build stonehenge.

>>640
You implied that something beyond normal was involved in the process of building Stonehenge in human origin or otherwise. I'm not even saying that you believe in aliens or are a proponent of conspiracy; I'm saying that your doubts as to the origin of Stonehenge are completely unfounded.

> You implied that something beyond normal was involved in the process of building Stonehenge in human origin or otherwise.
you got me there. I did imply that.
>I'm not even saying that you believe in aliens or are a proponent of conspiracy;
thank you
>I'm saying that your doubts as to the origin of Stonehenge are completely unfounded.
you might be right. again.

I'm a little frustrated by this because I could not care less about stonehenge. no offense meant.

>>620

http://usgovinfo.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=usgovinfo&cdn=newsissues&tm=14&f=00&su=p284.13.342.ip_&tt=2&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.gao.gov/n
ew.items/d0435.pdf

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf

http://articles.marketwatch.com/2009-04-28/finance/30779427_1_wage-gap-paycheck-fairness-act-gender

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/04/11/large-wage-discrepancy-in-the-white-house/

All of these found in 3 minutes on Google.

>>623
apparently I don't have a .pdf reader so I'll have to get back to you on the first two.

The third one puts the current wage gap at 11 cents. I couldn't possibly care less about that. You can shove your 30% difference right up you ass, along with every bullshit rape and domestic violence statistic that feminists build arguments on without any basis in reality.

There is always going to be a difference. If you tally the wages of blacks versus mexicans there is going to be a difference. If you tally the wages of people who wear hats versus those who don't there is going to be a difference. The fact that the numbers are so damn close is actually pretty surprising, and spending taxpayer money on these campaigns to even out wages penny-for-penny across some random metric like gender is fucking retarded beyond words.

The fourth link doesn't look at anything except gender. They're not in the same jobs, they all just happen to work in the same building. They even acknowledge in the article that they don't know any other factors, and that the reason is probably that there are more men in senior positions. If the secretary of defence is a man, and the secretary of phone calls is a woman, yeah, the man is going to make more. Now the argument is "why aren't there more women in senior positions?" and it's a fair question, but I'm gonna have to see some stats on how many women are actually gunning for these positions before I'm able to give a shit.

as for
>All of these found in 3 minutes on Google.
why the hell should I care how long it took you? Are you trying to guilt me for not looking up your sources for you?

>>625
I never asserted anything about the exact numbers on how much women are payed less but just that I know that they are and that its still a real problem.

>The third one puts the current wage gap at 11 cents. I couldn't possibly care less about that.
Well right here this prove not only that your a sexist but that your also a shit head.
When earning 80,000 a year as a man and a woman earning 72,000 for that same year is a big fucking deal.

>There is always going to be a difference.
And so I guess we should never do anything about it because if we can't eliminate it now due to whatever limitations that there are we should never do anything about it because fuck helping other people.

>why the hell should I care how long it took you? Are you trying to guilt me for not looking up your sources for you?
The point is that this information is INCREDIBLY accessible and so no one should deny that one can find this kind of information easily. The first is even a government study.

Also found with 3 minutes on Google:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303592404577361883019414296.html

>>627
I like how he naturally assumes that the 40% of American children growing up with unwed mothers are single moms and does not potentially factor in common law spouses/families, divorces, and other such factors that would have two parents but no marriage.

>>486

YEA JESUS FUCKING CRHIST. I DON'T SMOKE, DON'T WANT TO SMOKE, TRYING TO GET MY GIRLFRIEND TO QUIT, BUT THIS FUCKING PROPAGANDA IS B-FUCKING-S. DRINKING IS LINKED TO FAR MORE DEATHS, AND DOMESTIC ABUSE, AND ASSAULT THAN SMOKING WILL EVER BE BUT NO PROPAGANDA AT ALL. FUCKING DAMMIT.

>>491

There's propaganda against drinking all the fucking time. If it isn't about the general health risk it's about "drinking responsibly" which is fucking bullshit. I want to get drunk when I drink.

>>492

THAT SHIT IS NO WHERE NEAR THE DUMBFUCKERY OF "I LOST MY LEG TO SMOKING", DOUCHEFAG.

I don't drink - not that I'm a faggot-ass Mormon or something, I just don't like it - and I do think there needs to be way more anti-drinking propaganda. Not even that it'll be effective, but shit, if you're going to go after smoking and drugs, why not go after the one drug that does the most damage?

They're doing this shit because nobody gave a fuck when they said it gives you lung cancer. Hardly anybody gets the disfiguring shit, that's just fucked up luck. My goddamn grandma is 83, has smoked a pack a day for 60-odd years and is doing fine. Fuck you nosy liberals, trying to tell me what to do. I know it's bad for me, and I DON'T GIVE A FUCK. I LIKE TO SMOKE, and despite what they say, it DOES look fucking cool.

FUCKING A. But these motherfuckers aren't incapable of buying good headphones; they deliberately buy these sound-projecting ones so everyone can hear what they're listening to and know how hip they are.

FUCK YOURSELF IN THE ASS. EVEN IF YOU LIKE THE SAME MUSIC AS ME (you don't; I don't listen to hip-hop, fagstep or whatever hipster bullshit you're blasting) I STILL HATE YOU FOR THINKING THAT LISTENING TO COOL SHIT MAKES YOU COOL. GO SUCK OFF A SHOTGUN.

>>603
>and they don't look threatening
I laughed out loud, thanks

>hurr why do people not want kids drinking

MOTHERFUCKER

YOU THINK IT'S COOL TO FUCKING STUMBLE ABOUT THE PLACE AND VOMIT EVERYWHERE, DRIVE AROUND AIMLESSLY, MOST LIKELY INJURING THEMSELVES, DOING A WHOLE LOAD OF SHIT THEY WILL REGRET?

YOU'RE STUPID, AND YOUR FRIENDS ARE STUPID. EVERYONE WHO SUPPORTS YOUR VIEWPOINT IS STUPID

STUPID

>>480
says the anon who put "Sage" in the name field

SAGE has been used.

I THINK IT'D BE BETTER TO PROMOTE A CULTURE OF DRINKING NOT BEING A HUGE DEAL, THEN TEENAGERS WOULDN'T BE AS FUCKING STUPID ABOUT DRINKING.

>>540
I KEEP SAYING THIS. LOOK AT FUCKING EUROPE. THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A DRINKING AGE AND YET HAVE WAY LOWER INSTANCES OF BOTH BINGE DRINKING AND ALCOHOLISM. FUCKING WESTERN WORLD CAN SUCK MY COCK

It's legal in some states to drink with a parent in the household under 21. something like that.

>>493
Go slit your own throat and make the world a better place, before you spread any more misery.

Apologies in advance for my very amateur analysis of your description but so far her behaviour sounds like that of a psychopath. (Not the Hollywood definition of a psychopath but the psychiatric definition.)

I have been unfortunate enough to have met a psychopath in my life. If she is a psychopath and was anything like the one I met then I can truly empathise with you and your rage.

A psychopath is the master of lying and manipulation and emotional/physical abuse. They know how to get under your skin and exploit every weakness.

The majority of clinical psychologists state that to alter a psychopath's behaviour is impossible. The only thing one can do is walk away and cut all contact.

Psychopaths are extremely damaging to all they meet and the damage can run very, very deep.
Recovering from their abuse can take a VERY long time and its often difficult to get others to understand why you are so hurt or angry. (Hence the all the talk about simply being "alpha", etc.)

I too had pure and seemingly infinite rage for one person in my life and I worried for a long time that I would never get over it. All efforts to bury my anger hadn't worked.

This was until I started to read some writings on psychiatry and stumbled upon a couple of online articles on psychopaths:

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>493
You said so much bullshit about slitting your throat and buying guns to kill yourself, what's the fucking hold up?!

>>461

you hear that? THAT WHORE TRIED TO KILL HIM... PHYSICALLY!!... WITH A FUCKING KNIFE!!!!

rude

>mandatory

You're a fucking retard

>highway cops
>bad
Double whammy you fucking idiot.

Highway cops have to deal with retards on a day to day basis, retards, probably like you, who speed and put people in danger because they can't stand going 65 miles per hour like a decent, safe, human being.

Why the fuck do people insist on being fuck headed speed racers anyways? It feels like people have instantly forgotten how lucky they are to even be able to travel in a metal box going down a road at, what, like 12 times the speed of a regular humans running speed? How about you show some regard for the rules and for the system that allows you to be an entitles piece of shit you fucking piece of shit mother FUCK FUCK I'M SO FUCKING PISSED FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING FAGGOT

>>500
Holy shit, it's my lucky day.

I'm not even part of this thread and I've been looking for a fucking retard like you to tee off on for a while now. Unfortunately, there are so few people stupid enough to hold that opinion that finding one of you to argue with is like digging up retarded clams.

Listen dipshit. Cars are made to exceed 65, 70, or 75 mph speed limits like it's their fucking job. Unless an area on the freeway is known to be congested (In which case, fucking expand it) any normal, non-retard should be able to go at least 100mph as long as they're comfortable.

Seriously, fuck stupid dipshits like you who fucking dislike speeders. You dislike swervers. They endanger people. But why do they even exist? Because they're in a huge hurry and there is no lane for them to use their cars AS MOTHERFUCKING INTENDED.

Focus on drunk driving, tailgaters, and other dipshits all you want, but pretending that speed limits on the interstate system are for anything but faggot pigfodder makes me want to tear off the top of your head and give your exposed brain a HARD noogie while wearing a glove made completely out of the rough side of velcro.

>>501

You're fucking retarded if you think every car, every road, and every person is optimized to exceed speeds of at least 75mph. You probably speed on a daily basis because you think going 25 over the speed limit is something that is necessary when you're commuting 30 miles. I hope you get in a car crash you fucking piece of shit.

...Just kidding. But I still think you're a piece of shit.

>>501

Speed limits, like all posted rules of the road, exist to keep drivers on the same page and safe. You risk not just your life but the lives of everyone around you when you drive unpredictably.

I've almost been in some really gnarly accidents because of people driving way over posted speed limits. It's a dick move. Fuck you.

>>501
>I'M NOT THE PROBLEM, EVERYONE ELSE IS! I NEVER HAVE TO ABIDE BY RULES THAT HAVE THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE OF INTERFERING WITH MY PERSONAL LIFE BECAUSE MY EGO WON'T ALLOW IT.

>ALTHOUGH I PARTIALLY RECOGNIZE MY SOCIAL GUILT OVER THIS WARPED VIEW OF REALITY I IGNORE ITS GLARING WEAKNESSES BY USING CRIMES AND FAULTS OF OTHERS TO JUSTIFY BY RECKLESSNESS AND DISREGARD FOR THE WELL BEING OF MY FELLOW CITIZENS.

thought I'd just distill that into a more clear statement.

Arnold Schwartzenegger raps in Blackface now?

WHAT THE FUCK.

SAGE has been used.

>>433
also i like how the thumbnail code glitches that gif

NO I WILL NOT LICK YOUR COCK NIGGER

I AM A PROUD WHITE MALE

HAIL DAS UBERMENSCH DU ANGLO SAXON

Considering the way that faggot is acting on this IRC channel I go to (he's unfortunately an op on it) He's gonna meet a bloody end, either by my, someone else's or his own hands. Perferably the first and last choices.

>>432
what the fuck are you raging about?

>>478
Oh. Look. A fucking defender of him.

Eat my fucking jizz you kike.

Goddamnit, I hate poetry. FUCK YOU, OP.

I AM SICK AND TIRED OF FAGBOOK AND TWATTER! WHAT IS WRONG WITH LIVEJOURNAL AND MYSPACE?

SERIOUSLY THOUGH, IT JUST FUCKING SUCKS THAT OUR GAY ASS SOCIETY DEMANDS THAT WE GET THAT A GODDAMN SOCIAL MEDIA BUTTFUCK ACCOUNT IN ORDER TO GET ANY KIND OF JOB BECAUSE WE'RE ALL GOSSIPING TEENAGE GIRLS OR SOME SHIT THAT JUST CAN'T KEEP OUT OF EACH OTHER'S PERSONAL LIVES!!! FUCK!

Simple solution: Get a Facebook account. Add a few people from your childhood so it seems legit. Make one post every few weeks, something bland and generic. Also make it so no one can post on your wall but you. You don't have to check it all the time, you don't have to do shit. Problem solved.

>make fagbook
>post typical shit
>dont use it
problem solved op quit sucking dick and get your lazy ass a job

haha you think you can't get a job because you dont have social media? thats some high quality rationalization right there.

you dum kid