|
>>
|
No. 760
I really like >>754 and >>758. The first works well because the medium lends itself well to cityscapes and kind of sci fi stuff. The weird face one works well because it has this weird geometric kind of look.
>>756 and >>757 don't really work well for me because the nature of digital paint makes them look... cheesy or cartoony. The one with the fog/clouds and the car doesn't have the kind of cold grittiness that it should. It's too dry, to sterile. And the house again doesn't have the kind of dirty gritty look that would suit the subject matter.
The ones that I like it like a lot. That clean look works well for the first piece and it makes the weird geometric head look kind of otherworldly and unsettling.
So: futuristic cityscapes or sci fi stuff? Yes. Weird, geometric, vaguely scientific but strange images? Oh yes. Gritty real-world depictions? I dunno, not so much.
You've got some serious skill going on here, though. Keep it the fuck up. And, of course, if you enjoy painting things like the house then by all means keep doing it and don't listen to me.
|